Month: October 2006

10. Plain M&Ms – back in my less disciplined days, I’d eat a whole bunch in rainbow color order: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, brown. OK, brown’s not in the rainbow. Now, if I succumb to the candy, it’ll be one piece. And it’ll be green, of course.

9. Wheat Thins- I’ve started actually started looking at the packaging, deciding whether the “reduced fat” product or the “whole grain” product is better. Well, the former has fewer calories. Both are nearly as satisfying as the original, which is not always the case with these products.

8. Ritz Crackers – there was a time when I could devour a whole roll of these; a box holds three or four rolls. Usually consumed with diet cola. Hardly buy them now, even though, as Andy Griffith used to say, it is a “good cracker!”

7. York Peppermint Patty – The ersatz brands were almost never as good.

6. Oreos – probably the least healthy thing on the list. A transfat haven. I understand they have, or are in the midst of changing the formula, which could wreck them. Always consumed with milk.

5. Mounds – I almost never felt “like a nut”, but went with this coconut-laden treat.

4. Graham crackers – they don’t have to be Nabisco, but some of the store brands are not good at all. Many years ago, I used to soak them in milk, just shy of them disintegrating them into the beverage. Don’t do that any more.

3. Carrot cake – STILL the item I want for my birthday. With milk or vanilla ice cream.

2. Fig Newtons – or any of those Newton products. Here’s where vending machines are good for portion control. Two bars are OK; a half stack is bad. Usually with milk.

1. Ice cream – all kinds – vanilla, preferably French vanilla, with a bit of “bite” to it; strawberry; all variations of vanilla and chocolate together; and sundry fruity others. Some of the low fat/reduced fat things are OK, but there isn’t a “no fat” item I’ve tasted that has been worth opening the freezer door for.

On Thursday, I’ll be starting with one-pound weights to try to strengthen the wrist.(I’ve been told that canned produce can be substituted for weights.)

So, if I get a little terse in the next few days – because I’ll be typing, actually hunting-and-pecking, with my left (non-dominant) hand a lot – you’ll know why. Fortunately, I tend to work a little ahead, so you won’t have to go entirely without my pithy wisdom.
***
Follow closely: Boing Boing on October 13 had a link to Mike at Progressive Ruin’s great post about the comic strip Nancy, which cited my piece of January 22 about a parody of the strip. Got that?

So what I’d like to know is what advice would you like for that new resident? It might be a baby or immigrant.

I’d like to see if we can find ways to use up fewer of our natural resources, if we could find ways to listen more and talk less, to be courageous in the midst of doubters, and to be tolerant in the midst of fear. I also suggest voting as often as possible; it gives you the right to complain. There’s a blood drive in my building, and the accompanying poster reads something like: “My dad says giving blood is as important as voting.” I thought it was funny, since half the people don’t vote, which, of course, gives those of us who do with more relative power.

It goes on with a complaint by “Ted Shaw, civil rights advocate and president of the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund,” who called “for black artists to boycott Billboard.” It has a Jessie Jackson quote. Lynx was apparently distressed about Dave Chapelle’s sketch “depicting a blind, African American, Ku Klux Klan leader who was unaware that he was not white.”

The problem is: I couldn’t find this album ANYWHERE, including on the sisters’ website; they are 14-year-old twins, BTW. What made it initially plausible were the links to the real ABC News stories here (a YouTube video) and here. In fact, the first part of the Ted Shaw quote comes from the linked article. This doesn’t appear on my favorite mythbuster Snopes.com, but this is bogus. I always wonder who has the time or the inclination to make up such garbage.
***
Those of you not from the area may have missed the story about 2 guilty in sting case: Muslim immigrants face up to 25 years in prison:

Two Muslim immigrants who were targeted in an FBI sting were convicted on Tuesday of charges they supported terrorism by taking part in a fictitious plot to launder money from the sale of a shoulder-fired missile.
Yassin M. Aref, 36, a Kurdish refugee from northern Iraq whom the FBI identified as their “ultimate target,” was found not guilty on 20 of 30 counts filed against him. But Aref was convicted of several key charges, including money laundering and conspiracy to support terrorism, arguably diminishing the effect of the jury’s acquittals on two-thirds of the indictment against him.
Mohammed M. Hossain, 51, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Bangladesh who arrived in the United States more than 20 years ago aboard a cargo ship, was found guilty on all 27 counts he faced, including conspiracy to support terrorism. Hossain, who co-founded the Central Avenue mosque where Aref was the spiritual leader, owns a pizzeria and was targeted only because of his close relationship with Aref, authorities said.
The case was launched in 2003, after Aref’s name and Albany address were recovered from debris or notebooks in three suspected terrorist encampments during the early stages of the Iraq war. By that time, Aref already had been interviewed by FBI agents who had been assigned to visit mosques and ask Muslims to report any suspicious behavior.
The sting case began in July 2003 when an undercover informant went to Hossain’s small pizza shop and befriended him while posing as a wealthy importer. At the time, Hossain was struggling to keep his business afloat while managing a couple of rental properties he purchased through a county property auction.
The informant offered to loan money to Hossain. The pizzamaker suggested Aref, his mosque’s imam, be brought in to witness their loan transaction, which was what the FBI had hoped would happen.
Authorities contend the pair went along with the deal, even after the informant showed Hossain a shoulder-fired missile while disclosing that he earned money selling weapons to terrorists.
Defense attorneys countered the informant never made it clear the loan was connected to a terrorism plot or a specific terrorism organization, which the indictment alleged. They also said language barriers — the three men all spoke different native languages — prevented the defendants from understanding what was unfolding.
The case drew criticism from the American Civil Liberties Union and other critics of the Bush administration’s post-9/11 counterterrorism tactics. The ACLU had joined the case at one point, unsuccessfully challenging the judge’s decision to allow the government to make numerous classified filings in the case that remain sealed.

Earlier stories noted that “Aref also faces three separate charges for allegedly lying on a green card application and while being interviewed by FBI agents about his ties to a Kurdish political party.” Much of the information was provided by an informant, who was under indictment in another matter.

This case troubled me in so many ways. Not surprisingly, the verdicts are being appealed, and I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if the appeals are successful because:
* The informant is squirrely, and helped in entrapping the others.
* The language barrier was great. The two men convicted and the informant all had different native languages. Indeed, some of the original documents that placed them under suspicion were mistranslated by the government, with one of the men thought to have been addressed as “commander” when the actual word was something more benign, such as “fellow member”.
* Most important is the judge’s instruction to the jury, which stated that the FBI had reason for taking the action they did. It’s not only prejudicial, it seems actionable by the entity that administers judges.
***
The local paper has a blog with a weekly feature, This week’s 2-faced heads. “Every Friday, we pass along a little collection of potentially double-meaning headlines culled throughout the week from newspapers, wire services and online sites.” Well, I found one in that paper Tour boat owner remains in cases. If you think of “remains” as a noun, this is a very funny headline about a very sad case, described in the subhead, “Mohican vessel operator kept as a defendant in Ethan Allen deaths”, and the first paragraph: “ALBANY — Two Lake George tour boat companies faced off in U.S. District Court Tuesday over the sinking of the Ethan Allen in which 20 senior citizens drowned.”
***
One of my fellow bloggers, knowing I used to work in a comic book store, sent me a link about The Secret Origins of Batman, how Bob Kane (or his assistants) swiped a lot of work. This appeared a few months ago in a column I generally read, but somehow I missed it.

I find it a strange and interesting “dichotomy” that people have concerning the Internet (Blogs, emails). We’ve been at our company looking a User Generated Content (blogs, RSS, etc). And trying to understand this “yet another variation” of cyberspace and how it impacts our company and our clientele. A recent survey by Pew on Bloggers, indicated that Bloggers “see” their blogs as a private thing, in spite of the fact they are using a public medium where everyone and anyone can see it. I cannot help but wonder if cell phones have influenced the blurring of private and public conversations. How many people have you “heard” in a public place that speaking loud enough for everyone in hearing distance on their cell phone, some conversations that really should not be made public.

Things that make you go hmmmmm.

I thought it interesting enough to steal, er, borrow for my blog, but I thought I would ask her. In the TO: line was her name and the listserv name. I swore I had deleted the latter. That is, until I got back my own message, at which point I quickly apologized to the list. One respondent, Dan the Data Wrangler, wrote back: “Hey, no problem….at least it wasn’t one that contained highly personal or salacious content. :-)” I replied, “I try not to do salacious.”

In any case, in searching for the Pew study which the initial writer mentioned, I came across this Business Week article from July 19, 2006 entitled “Pew Blog Study Shows the Lure of Storytelling is High” by Heather Green:

The Pew Internet and American Life Project has a new study out on blogging that finds that most people who blog do it to tell stories about their lives–not to write about politics, tech, or media.
One tidbit I found particularly interesting is that 55% of bloggers write using a pseudonym…
Pew found that about 8%, or 12 million American adults, blog, while 39% of the population, or 57 million people, read blogs.

This, as these things do, led me to another study, Bloggers’ FAQ on Student Blogging:
According to a November 2005 study by the Pew Internet & American Life Project, 19% of online teens keep a blog and 38% read them. This represents approximately four million students who blog and is a significantly higher percentage than the adult population (7%).

Then, this one: In court, blogs can come back to dog the writers; Use as evidence increases by Sacha Pfeiffer of the Boston Globe, September 28, 2006.

Yes, I’m blogging about blogging again, how I’m a part of a growing number of people putting out whatever random thoughts come to me on a regular basis, and part a slight minority of bloggers who actually doesn’t write pseudonymously. But it’s more about how I’ve seen people in blogs making curious choices about what they put out there. I know one buddy who put out info about his trip to Florida, but it was AFTER he got back – pretty clever, that one. Another chum noted problems at work; hey, I’ve noted my disdain for my new office – the white noise that otherwise would tend to put me to sleep, and as a result, how my caffeine consumption is way up – but that is something I would say, heck, HAVE said, to the powers that be. I don’t say anything that I wouldn’t want quoted out of context. Or at least, I try not to.

The initial quote above was in response to an ongoing dialogue; the previous post was from Dan, who wrote:

Personally, I think the last thing we need is more legislation about privacy, or anything else. As the author you quote notes, and as I hope we all know, anything you ever do, or anything you ever say, put into electronic form, or on paper can probably be retrieved. If you don’t want someone to know what you think, keep it to yourself.

No matter what anyone thinks, privacy doesn’t exist. It may have at one point, but it certainly doesn’t now. Legislation will not change that one bit.