LONG-time blogger Dustbury asks a question for this round of Ask Roger Anything:
If a purely arbitrary decision was handed down to the effect that you could no longer remain in upstate New York, where would you first consider going?
I’ve thought on this a lot, actually. It’s pretty much a process of elimination.
Not moving to anywhere there is no fresh water, so desert states such as Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico are definitely out. California – well, is the big earthquake still coming?
I’d like to be out of direct range of hurricanes, which eliminates Florida, not that I wouldn’t have passed on it for other reasons; and the parts of the states on the Gulf coast and southern part of the Atlantic are unlikely.
Not Texas, because Texas is Texas.
I’m wary of being in tornado alley, which seems to encompass much of the center of the country from Oklahoma to Ohio.
Places I had considered before I’m now rethinking; I worry about Washington and Oregon after the Fukushima nuclear plant meltdown in Japan, maybe not enough to eliminate them, but it’s a factor. I wouldn’t pass on all the states along with the flood-prone Mississippi River, but any place that’s flooded in the last 15 years, I can imagine flooding again.
I hear the Deep South is more enlightened than it used to be; not sure I’d want to move there.
I REALLY liked Madison, Wisconsin when I was there in 1988. Always appreciate the state’s progressive tradition. Don’t love the current governor, though.
Do I want somewhere warmer? Certainly NOT colder, which eliminates Minnesota and Maine.
Ultimately, it would be either in a small college town or a larger college town with decent mass transit in New England, but probably not Connecticut, which often feels like suburbia. Rhode Island is a possibility. I’m fond of Northampton, Massachusetts.
My pick, all things being equal, is southern Vermont. After all, Vermont was part of New York, before it was broken off to become the 14th state. Both New York and Vermont have a maple syrup tradition. And, in spite of damage from some recent hurricanes, both tend to be out of hurricane alley.
Hawaii sounds more than pleasant, although I suppose there is always rising sea levels to worry about!
SP- I was thinking the same thing. Also, things are expensive there, because of its isolation.
I live less than a mile from fresh, running water. Of course, it’s a canal, and we’re in the middle of a decade-long drought, and it never rains, but HOW DARE YOU JUDGE ARIZONA, SIR?!?!?!?!?
Only judging it by MY needs, Greg. You wanna live in the desert, be my guest!
We have this debate all the time…centering around where to move when we retire. Warmer climates are most attractive. North florida is topping the list, but coastal Georgia is also a contender.
Until recent decisions about voting and Gay rights, Me and Dee Dee were thinking of North Carolina.
In recent years more people leave NY State than enter it. In 2012 some 405,000 moved out of NY State, while only 270,000 migrated to NY State. The top destinations for New Yorkers were NJ, Pennsylvania, Florida and California. My source? Check out this cool interactive graph:
http://vizynary.com/2013/11/18/restless-america-state-to-state-migration-in-2012/
Dan – where would YOU go?