CHQ: Boyz II Men
Motownphilly
Roger Green: a librarian's life, deconstructed.
Motownphilly
2 Tony awards
I was recently making a list of my favorite movies. Field Of Dreams is definitely on it, and James Earl Jones’ near-monologue is a primary reason.
But it’s the voice, in everything from Star Wars (1977 et al.)to The Lion King (1994) to the CNN tag – all represented in this brief Simpsons clip – that he was best known for. Listen also to his narration of Edgar Allan Poe’s The Raven. Per Mark Evanier, he even did an episode of Garfield.
It’s strange for someone who stuttered so severely as a child, born on January 17, 1931, in Arkabutla, MS, that he stopped speaking for a time because of his abusive grandmother’s treatment. “Mr. Jones profited from a deep analysis of meaning in his lines. ‘Because of my muteness,’ he said in ‘Voices and Silences,’ a 1993 memoir written with Penelope Niven, ‘I approached language in a different way from most actors. I came at language standing on my head, turning words inside out in search of meaning, making a mess of it sometimes, but seeing truth from a very different viewpoint.'”
I also saw him in the movies, including The Bingo Long Traveling All-Stars & Motor Kings (1976), Coming to America (1988), The Hunt for Red October (1990), Sneakers (1992), The Sandlot (1993), and more recently, Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964).
Indeed, I watched him in anything that aired on TV, including Homicide: Life on the Street, Picket Fences, Law & Order, and NYPD Blue, and his portrayal of Alex Haley on Roots: The Next Generation.
The Brooks and Marsh book on TV described his role as a police captain on Paris (1979), a short-lived program, as lacking “believability… Jones, a highly respected actor, strutted through this role speaking in booming, stentorian tones as if it were Richard III.” But I watched it; it was James Earl Jones! On this show, he met his second wife, Cecilia Hart, who predeceased him.
Alas, I never saw him on stage. “A commanding presence on the Broadway stage, Jones earned four competitive Tony Award nominations for Best Actor in a Play, winning twice for his performances as Jack Jefferson in The Great White Hope in 1969 and Troy Maxson in August Wilson’s Fences in 1987. He received a Special Tony Award at the 2017 ceremony…
“In September 2022, the Shubert Organization rechristened its 110-year-old Cort Theatre as The James Earl Jones Theatre… ‘For me standing in this very building 64 years ago at the start of my Broadway career, it would have been inconceivable that my name would be on the building today,’ Jones said in a statement… “Let my journey from then to now be an inspiration for all aspiring actors.'”
Jones was a 2002 Kennedy Center Honoree and received Lifetime Achievement Awards from SAG-AFTRA in 2009 and the National Board of Review in 1995. Here’s a 1996 interview, a life in pictures, a critic’s appreciation of an “ideal elevator companion,” and the New York Times obituary.
Given the fact that he was 93 and had lived what most would consider a “good life,” I was surprised at how utterly sad I was at his passing.
Hoover Institute
The Hoover Institute published a paper, Restoring Confidence in American Elections, in June 2024. Distinguished Visiting Fellow Ben Ginsberg and Stanford professor Bruce Cain wrote it. The paper explores “the polarization in American election views. It also analyzes where common ground might be found to bring divided factions together.”
As an old political science major, I was interested in what they had to say, even though Hoover was considered “conservative.”
“The core division over election reform is often now characterized as ‘fraud versus suppression,’ and the partisan gap on this issue is wider today than in the past. Public faith in the accuracy of US elections is currently at an historic low, with more than 30 percent of the population doubting the accuracy of elections. If unaddressed, this could severely undermine the US political system and its form of government, which is rooted in the peaceful transfer of power… ” Several surveys in recent years, including from the Ad Council (2023), confirm this.
“Evidence from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab backs this up [finds] that voters are mostly unaware of the many complex and specific procedures that election administrators follow. In some instances, the procedures voters thought would give them more confidence in the election process were already in place.” As a poll worker in 2021, I was impressed by the training beforehand and the intentional redundancy in the counting process. Fraud would be extremely difficult to introduce into the system.
“The current legitimacy crisis over US elections may be more reflective of what voters learned from news coverage, social media, and online sources of information than what they personally experienced.” Or, I would posit, lies told by certain candidates and their surrogates.
“The decentralized delegation to the states of many procedural details for state and federal elections means that voters are often surprised to learn that other states have different rules. More than ten thousand jurisdictions are responsible for the casting, counting, and certification of their
communities’ votes.” It IS convoluted.
“The United States’ strong federalist structure may also be a contributing factor to the rise of convenience voting, an increasingly popular but controversial method of balloting. Because the United States has so many elections at all levels of government, voters in many states must
fill out very long and complicated ballots… Understandably, many citizens now prefer the convenience of voting at home and dropping the ballot off at a voting center, rather than navigating the long lines while waiting for other people to work their way through the lengthy list of choices on
Election Day.”
Certain districts also had longer lines, and while some states allow time off to vote, others do not.
“The growing partisan divide on voting rules is also reflected in the pattern of new voting law proposed by each party in the states… Democrats generally propose laws that provide more opportunities for people to vote with fewer requirements, whereas Republicans prefer laws that provide more checks to make it harder for potentially ineligible individuals to vote. The result is significantly more litigation over election laws, as well as a ramping up of partisan campaign rhetoric over “fraud” or “suppression” in get-out-the-vote messaging, all of which contribute to more partisan polarization in the country as a whole.”
There’s a degree of “both sides” in the argument, which I disagree with.
I admit I’m suspicious of Texas Republicans who are accused of intimidation. The homes of members of the United States’ oldest Latino civil rights organizations were raided over voter fraud claims.
More problematic in terms of the 2024 presidential election involves Georgia. “In a series of meetings in July and August, the Georgia State Election Board voted 3-2 to change the rules governing local election boards. (The three members voting to change the rules all deny that Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020, despite the complete lack of evidence for that view. Trump has given them a shout-out at a political rally. When was the last time a national candidate paid any attention to a state election board?)” If the vote is as close as it was in 2020, expect chaos.
Most infuriating, How Tennessee Keeps Nearly Half a Million People From Voting. “While nearly all states suspend or withdraw people’s right to vote when they are convicted of felonies, most allow restoring that right after they have served their sentences… But Tennessee has moved in the opposite direction, making the process significantly more difficult. (Think: bureaucratic maze from hell.) About 9 percent of the state’s voting-age population is prohibited from voting because of felony convictions.”
I’m skipping over the Common Myths section of the Hoover argument, which is interesting but not pivotal. The authors list reasonable suggestions, albeit difficult to achieve.
Enact Legislation to Better Secure the Safety of Election Officials
and Poll Workers
Encourage Greater Uniformity in Electoral Practices through Evidence-Based Assessments of Both Participation and Security Impacts. “The issue should be viewed on two levels. One is differences between the states, which are perhaps inevitable given our history not only in matters involving elections but also in many other matters of governance. More solvable is the lack of uniformity among jurisdictions within a single state, which also causes confusion and, therefore, an erosion of confidence in elections.” Yes. “Uniformity in the administration of a state’s laws and standardization of electoral systems within a state’s jurisdictions could lead to a vast increase in public confidence in elections.”
Outreach to the Public on Voting Administration Should Be Targeted, Tested, and Coordinated
Develop Bipartisan “Standards of Reliability” to Reassure the Public of the
Accuracy of Elections. This has several components. Absentee ballot / mail-in ballot validation measures. Prompt reporting of election results. Easily available mail/early voting (no excuse). National voter ID (including one-time initial proof of citizenship for all current voters, available at no cost). Online voter registration. Notice and cure of defective ballots. Drop boxes monitored with video. Voter roll maintenance – a BIG problem. Multistate database to check duplicate voter registrations.
Also: Absentee ballot applications to all voters but not live ballots. No ballot harvesting – I TOTALLY agree with this. Paper trail for all ballots. Postelection risk-limiting audits. Observers allowed in polling places and where votes are tabulated – “Observers should be required to attend a training session to familiarize themselves with the jurisdiction’s processes so they can better understand what they observe.” Adequate funding for elections. Protection for election officials.
Here’s the conclusion: “Some might conclude that these examples of plausible initial steps of bipartisan election administration are too small and that reform efforts should go big or go home. That would be fine if the country were not deeply polarized and bipartisan consensus was not so difficult to achieve. Cross-party reforms necessarily involve negotiation and building trust by finding the most obvious points of agreement first. Continuing down a path that undermines public faith in democratic institutions is not an acceptable option. Even if small steps do not address
the underlying problems associated with strong federalism or overly partisan officials, they would be a valuable start toward changing the negative direction of contemporary American citizen culture.”
I think it’s a useful document. Coordinating information among the states seems particularly difficult, but the rationale for it makes sense. But what do you think we can/should do to Restore Confidence in American Elections?
scandally clad
I have been losing my grammar grouch badge. Frankly, I never really embraced the title. As early as 1972, when the first issue of Ms. magazine came out- I purchased it right away – I realized the efficacy of using the word Ms. as opposed to Miss or Mrs., in comparison with the term Mr.
I’ve embraced variations on you. Newish takes on they/them make a lot of sense to me.
Part of my learning on the topic comes from being around my wife, who taught English as a New Language, formerly known as English as a Second Language. Among other things, I realized that English is difficult and irrational; often, it doesn’t make much sense.
Actually, I knew that well before that, certainly by the time I first saw Dr. Seuss’s book The Tough Coughs As He Ploughs the Dough.
I have been listening to a lot of YouTube videos by RobWords. He takes on some of the weird variations in the language, looking at the historical as well as the current usage. He explains, for instance, in The Great Vowel Shift, why certain words that look like they should rhyme do not. (When I was doing Wordle recently and was trying to find words ending in ROWN, I immediately picked up brown, crown, drown, and frown but missed grown because it doesn’t rhyme.) Certainly, somebody who isn’t a native speaker would have real difficulty with that.
Still, I remember back in 2005 when a bunch of bloggers were new to me. One of them, a very smart guy, had a terrible time comparing the word its and the word it’s. Without him asking, I made it my mission to gently, firmly, and repetitively explain the difference. BTW, it did not work. I now look back at that with a certain degree of, “Boy, was I arrogant,” along with “Why are you bothering to do this?”
More recently, some folks online were lamenting that young people don’t end their sentences with a period/full stop. It wasn’t this 2021 article, but the sentiment was the same. The subtitle: To younger people, putting a period at the end of a casually written thought could mean that you’re raring for a fight.
“To younger generations, using proper punctuation in a casual context like texting can give an impression of formality that borders on rudeness, as if the texter is not comfortable enough with the texting partner to relax. The message-ending period establishes a certain distance… Simply put, the inclusion of a formality in casual communication is unnerving.
“Think of a mother using her son’s full name when issuing a stern ultimatum.”
I didn’t say this, but I should have included that in this space of acronyms (LMAO, TY): We older folks are non-native speakers. We should at least try to speak their language, as I practiced my rudimentary French in 2023 when I was in western France.
“Every generation tends to loathe to some extent the way the generation after them speaks.”
Oh, John Green muses over Which is Correct? — or – ? And why not?
RobWords asked, Where did punctuation come from?
He makes a very good case that spaces between words are punctuation marks. Unlike the Greeks and Romans, who had to read breakeless texts mumbling aloud like a modern six-year-old, spaces and other punctuation made texts more comprehensible. We can thank, in part, the proselytizing by early Christians.
I’m pretty lax about apostrophes. Some believe the apostrophe used to show possession is a shortening of John his horse to John’s horse. This is probably not true.
“In Old English, you just stuck an S on the end of a noun to reference it as belonging to someone with no apostrophe needed.”
If you want to use a word to show the possession of the house owned by the Joneses, I don’t care if they use JONES or JONESES, with or without the apostrophe, But the one thing that does make me crazy is when they use JONE’S; you never break into the word.
certain that you’ve used at least one.
“Say you’ve heard someone voicing disapproval about another person’s clothing – or more precisely, lack of it. If you’ve never come across the phrase “scantily clad” before – or the word scantily at all – it’s perfectly logical to then interpret that as “scandally clad”. It’s kind of clever. You’ve even had to invent a word.”
Eggcorns, mondegreens, and even malaprops don’t bother me as they used to.
A line must be drawn.
But their #1, and mine as well, is literally. Over a decade ago, I purged it from my vocabulary. As I wrote: “While using literally to mean figuratively may be OK (for some), what do I use when I REALLY, REALLY mean literally? How can I make this clear to the reader/listener? Therefore, I must sadly conclude that the word ‘literally’ has been rendered useless to me. If it doesn’t mean one thing, but rather the thing OR its opposite, then it doesn’t mean anything at all.”
This was ticking me off
We do not allow content that is designed to deceive, mislead, or overwhelm users in order to artificially increase viewership. This content detracts from people’s ability to engage authentically on our platforms and can threaten the security, stability and usability of our services. We also seek to prevent abusive tactics, such as spreading deceptive links to draw unsuspecting users in through misleading functionality or code, or impersonating a trusted domain.
Online spam is a lucrative industry. Our policies and detection must constantly evolve to keep up with emerging spam trends and tactics. In taking action to combat spam, we seek to balance raising the costs for its producers and distributors on our platforms, with protecting the vibrant, authentic activity of our community.