The writer who reviewed every album

Rolling Stone’s ‘500 Greatest Albums of All Time’ list

Every album? On January 28, Medium writer Harris Sockel noted: “Last weekend, I spent several hours digging into a majestic 138-minute read by Tom Morton-Collings (it’s more of a book, to be honest). He began the project last year, inspired by Rolling Stone magazine’s 500 Greatest Albums of All Time

“He decided to listen to all 6,800 songs on all 500 albums. It took him over six months. He writes:

“’I grew up as a music fan believing in the medium of the album as sacred. Somewhere along the way, I’d lost sight of that. I ditched all my physical media a long time ago. I only used streaming services and, more and more, was only listening to playlists curated… based on my listening habits. […] I wasn’t expanding my musical horizons at all. If anything, they were narrowing.’”

As you likely know, I’m enough of a dinosaur to play CDs still. And I received a record player for Christmas!

“What follows is the most detailed, exhaustive journey through the last 70 years of music that I’ve ever seen… While reading, I kept pausing to revisit albums I hadn’t heard in decades… I made a few new discoveries, like Laura Nyro’s Eli and the 13th Confession (1968) [LISTEN!]. And I learned that Rolling Stone really needs to listen to its own list, because Morton-Collings points out a few (what he perceives as) lazy choices — like including a five-hour Merle Haggard compilation as one of its ‘top albums of all time.’ A more discerning curator would’ve picked just one of the artist’s 66 studio albums.”

Suffice it to say, I LOVED reading these reviews. Albums he thought he should like but didn’t. Artists he’d heard of but had never listened to: Carole King’s Tapestry! [LISTEN] (He Loved/Liked it.)

How to

Morton-Colling’s process: “I made the decision to listen to every single one of these 500 albums, in full — in reverse order, from number 500 down to number 1 — to provide a short summation on each (5 words at first, but this was changed to 10 for the top 100) along with an arbitrary rating of my own (Loved/Liked/Maybe/Nah, or a combination of those). Also to give more elaborate feedback on selected highlights. Generally, I just wanted to open myself up to it all.”

And he owns his biases. Regarding Brothers In Arms by Dire Straits [LISTEN]. “Now then. At some point, I was always going to have to ditch my attempt to not include albums I was already familiar with as highlights. But this is with good reason. This isn’t just an album I’m familiar with, at this point it almost makes up some of the sequence of my DNA. It was released when I was 1 yr old and I feel like it has been part of my life ever since. It seeped through my skin due to constant exposure. I wouldn’t choose to be without it any more than I’d choose to be without my thumbs. It’s the sound of childhood, of endless car journeys, sat in the back seat in the middle, sandwiched between my 2 big brothers.”

More Island Records

So what albums besides these would be in my Top 25? Here are some, with links to all of them.

Not on the RS list: East/West– Butterfield Blues Band

343. Greatest Hits — Sly and the Family Stone (1970): “Funky-soul singles from improbable family. (Liked/Maybe).” This is the only greatest hits album I’d put on my list.

334. Abraxas — Santana (1970): “Relaxing, Latin-rock, guitar hero vibes. (Liked)”

I especially liked the longer piece about 3. Blue (1971) Joni Mitchell

“Overall, it made me think about how we interact with albums. How, with further listens, certain music can open up for you, but how many times those further listens won’t happen? I think sometimes, you just need that one moment to hang onto and go back. I mentioned that with this, for me, it was ‘River.. With that one moment as an anchor you can go back and find more moments that you like, and again until it all falls into place…

“With one listen, I might have dismissed this album. With repeated listens, it might become one of my all-time favourites. (Loved/Liked)”

This is why I have listened to every new album I’ve received three times before putting away.

In search of a blue tsunami

Just counting on disdain for the guy occasionally at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to translate into Congressional victory is a terrible plan.

My friend Carla, who I’ve known since high school choir, suggested:

I have an idea for your blog… or maybe just a title…. something like “keep it up Mr. President and the tsunami in November is going to be very, very blue”

What she means is that there could be be far more Democrats in Congress after the November 2018 election than after the 2016 vote.

My immediate reaction is that I’m not so sure that it’s true. Sure the Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke has allowed drilling along all the coastline of the United States. And then excluded Florida because 1) Governor Rick Scott, a Republican, is probably running for the US Senate and Floridians HATE looking at off-shore rigs, like the rest of us do, and 2) Mar-a-lago, where Agent Orange likes to spend time, is in Florida.

And sure The Tweeter-in-Chief says stupid stuff on a wide swath of issues, from marijuana to immigration – I need to write on these more extensively – and I feel he makes the US a laughing stock all over the world.

He lies so much that I don’t think he’s even fully aware of it. When his trip to the UK was canceled, he blamed it on the Obama administration’s design of the new embassy even though it was arraigned by George W. Bush.

In short, he is an embarrassment.

Yet, if the stock market is up, and the tax bill cuts people’s taxes in the short term, and unemployment, which fell sharply under Obama, continues to do so, and stores such as Walmart raise wages (from $9 to $11 per hour, even as they slash jobs at Sam’s Club outlets), then some people will be satisfied with the status quo.

It is true that in the generic electoral ballots, Democrats are doing quite well. But one does not vote for a generic candidate, but for specific individuals. I’m pleased that over 30 Republicans have deigned not to run for reelection. An “open” seat is much easier to win rather than running against an incumbent.

Nevertheless, unless people go out and work these elections, getting people registered and then get out to vote, Democrats will not automatically win. It can happen, as it did in Alabama in December 2017, when Doug Jones beat Roy Moore for the US Senate seat that had not been blue in a quarter century.

Just counting on disdain for the guy occasionally at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to translate into Congressional victory is a terrible plan. But the blue tsunami IS possible.

Oh, I love this picture above. Read the story about its creation.

Ramblin' with Roger
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial